Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Time
Articles

Care in Hard Times from the Perspective of Elderly Care Workers

Anikó Vida
University of Szeged, Hungary
Bio

Published 2022-12-22

Keywords

  • care crisis,
  • elderly care system,
  • gender inequalities,
  • construction of care,
  • recognition of care works

How to Cite

Vida, A. (2022). Care in Hard Times from the Perspective of Elderly Care Workers. Papers in Arts and Humanities, 2(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.52885/pah.v2i2.106

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has deepened and reshaped the care crisis both on personal and organizational levels. The study aims at answering how and in what form the symptoms of the care crisis appear in elderly care, which is one of the most important but undervalued fields of professional care. The focus of the study lies on what additional burdens the primarily female employees bear due to performing both paid and reproductive labor at the same time. The primary focus of the qualitative case study, conducted in the summer of 2020 and the spring of 2021, was to explore the effects of the coronavirus pandemic. The preliminary assumption is that the measures to curb the pandemic exacerbated the pre-existing organizational crisis and made it even more visible. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted in a mid-sized town located in the Southern Great Plain in Hungary with the key stakeholders of care management: heads of institutions and mostly middle managers in coordinating roles. In the second phase of the study, focus group interviews were conducted with non-executive carer workers. The purpose of the interviews was to explore their personal perceptions and narratives of care.

References

  1. Acsády J. (2014). A gondoskodás társadalmi konstrukciója. Replika, 85–86, 147–163.
  2. Bányai, E. (2008). A sztenderdizáció árnyoldalai. Kapocs, 7(35), 1–18.
  3. Csoba J. (2020). Szolidaritás deficitekkel. Ki tapsol a szociális munkásoknak? In Kovács É. & Takács J. (Eds.), Látjuk-e mi jön? A koronavírus-járvány hatása a magyar társadalomra és társadalomkutatásra. Socio.hu Társadalomtudományi Szemle 10(2), 95-211 (pp. 115–116). http://real.mtak.hu/111254/1/36_korona_hozzaszolasok.pdf
  4. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound). (2020). Long-term care workforce: Employment and working conditions. [Ad hoc report]. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/36712
  5. Fónai M., Patyán L., & Szoboszlai K. (2001). Szociális munkások pályaképének néhány eleme. Esély, 12(6), 89–109.
  6. Gregor A., & Kováts E. (2020). Koronajárvány: A gondoskodási válság látványos lelepleződése. In Fokasz N., Kiss Z., & Vajda J. (Eds.), Koronavírus idején (pp. 127–133). Replika Alapítvány. https://replika.hu/sites/default/files/attachedfiles/korona-v5_1.pdf
  7. Gyarmati A. (2021). A szociális ágazatban dolgozók munkakörülményeinek, járványhelyzettel, szakszervezetekkel kapcsolatos véleményének felmérése [Research report]. Ökopolisz Alapítvány. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349519530_A_szocialis_agazatban_dolgozok_munkakorulmenyei_jarvanykezeles_erdekervenyesites.
  8. Gyarmati A. (2022). Az idősellátásban dolgozó munkavállalók helyzete az Európai Unióban és Magyarországon. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Alapítvány. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/19035.pdf
  9. Melegh, A., & Katona, N. (Eds.). (2020). Towards a scarcity of care? Tensions and contradictions in transnational elderly care systems in central and Eastern Europe. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/16945.pdf.
  10. Milánkovics, C. (2020). Challenges facing Hungarian care workers when trying to act for themselves in the United Kingdom and in Hungary. In A. Melegh & N. Katona (Eds.), Towards a scarcity of care? Tensions and contradictions in transnational elderly care systems in central and Eastern Europe (pp. 166–182). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/16945.pdf
  11. Rottenberg, C. (2021). The Care Crisis by Emma Dowling. The Sociological Review Magazine. https://doi.org/10.51428/tsr.lzbc4827
  12. Sevenhuijsen, S. L. (1998). Too good to be true? Feminist considerations about trust and social cohesion. In IWM Working Papers (Vol. 3, pp. 1–15).
  13. Sevenhuijsen, S. L. (2003). The place of care. The relevance of the ethics of care in social policy. In S. L. Sevenhuijsen & A. Švab (Eds.), Labyrinths of Care. The relevance of the ethics of care perspective for social policy (pp. 13–41). Peace Institute.
  14. Sevenhuijsen, S. L., & Švab, A. (Eds.). (2004). The Heart of the Matter: The contribution of the ethic of care to social policy in some new EU member states. Peace Institute.
  15. Szabó L. (2013). Idősellátás kérdőjelekkel. Esély, 24(4), 87–97.
  16. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral Boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
  17. Vida A. (2015). ”Hát rajtunk ki segít?”A szociális ellátásban dolgozók helyzete és szegénységképe egy dél-alföldi kisvárosban. In Virág T. (Ed.), Törésvonalak. Szegénység és etnicitás vidéki terekben (pp. 167–181). Argumentum Kiadó.