Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): People
Articles

Populism: Focusing on the People's Interest

PDF
  • Irina-Ana Drobot
Irina-Ana Drobot
University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
Bio

Published 2024-07-29

Keywords

  • elites,
  • masses,
  • ideology,
  • individualism,
  • public image

Copyright (c) 2024 Irina-Ana Drobot

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Populism: Focusing on the People’s Interest. (2024). Papers in Arts and Humanities, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.52885/n8aqrd80

Abstract

Ever since the times of ancient philosophy, the focus of politics has been the well-being of the people, which has been ensured, throughout history, through various approaches. The search for a leader that is honest and also able to do justice can be seen as one of the constant wishes of the people. The way politicians build their public image struggles to achieve this sentiment of trust. Currently, Populism has risen in popularity since it claims to promote the interests of the masses, of the “pure” people, and not those of the corrupted political elite. Populism gives citizens the feeling that they are in control and free to make the right choice of leader to ensure their well-being. The present paper will rely on the fact that the increasing individualism across the world is being exploited here with respect to the citizens, who want to feel that they have the freedom of choice. The question is to what extent they truly have this freedom and to what extent they change one ideology with another. Is this alternative ideology, being tolerated next to the so-called mainstream one, an illusion or not? The paper will include the case study of a Post-Communist country, Romania.

PDF

References

  1. Bartha, Á. (2015). Review of A magyar népi mozgalom története: 1920–1990 [History of the Hungarian Populist Movement: 1920–1990], by I. Papp. The Hungarian Historical Review, 4(1), 215–219. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24575796
  2. Bonet, L., & Zamorano, M. M. (2020). Cultural policies in illiberal democracies: A conceptual framework based on the Polish and Hungarian governing experiences. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(5), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/102 86632.2020.1806829
  3. Bonikowski, B., Halikiopoulou, D., Kaufmann, E., Rooduijn, M. (2018). Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: A scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism, 25, 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12480
  4. Brubaker, R. (2020). Populism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 26(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12522
  5. Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  6. Chiruta, I. (2023). Challenging the rule of law in Romania: The metamorphosis of political discourse towards populism. Problems of Post-Communism, 70(1), 76–93.
  7. De Cleen, B. (2016). The party of the people versus the cultural elite: Populism and nationalism in Flemish radical right rhetoric about artists. JOMEC Journal, 9, 70–91.
  8. De Cleen, B. (2017). Populism and nationalism. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 342–362). Oxford University Press.
  9. De Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017). Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism. Javnost–The Public, 24(4), 301– 319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
  10. Deiwiks, C. (2009). Populism. Living Reviews in Democracy, 1(1)
  11. Doiciar, C., & Cretan, R. (2021). Pandemic populism: COVID-19 and the rise of the nationalist AUR party in Romania. Geographica Pannonica, 25(4).
  12. Dragoman, D. (2021). “Save Romania” union and the persistent populism in Romania. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(4), 303–314.
  13. ECPS. (2023). Euroscepticism. https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/euroscepticism/
  14. Finchelstein, F., & Urbinati, N. (2018). On Populism and democracy. Populism, 1(1), 15–37.
  15. Ham, C. B. (2000). The cultural challenge to individualism. Journal of Democracy, 11(1), 127–134.
  16. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.
  17. Knight, A. (1998). Populism and neo-Populism in Latin America, especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(2), 223–248.
  18. Mungiu‐Pippidi, A. (2001). The return of populism–The 2000 Romanian Elections. Government and Opposition, 36(2), 230–252.
  19. Overholser, L. (2023). [Review of Taylor, Mary N. 2021. Movement of the people: Hungarian folk dance, populism, and citizenship. Indiana University Press. 316 pp. Illus]. Hungarian Cultural Studies, 16, 212–215.
  20. Pappas, T. S. (2014). Populist democracies: Post-authoritarian Greece and post-communist Hungary. Government and Opposition, 49(1), 1–23.
  21. Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
  22. Rensmann, L. (2023). Illusions of sovereignty: Understanding populist crowds with Hannah Arendt. The Review of Politics, 85(4), 450–473.
  23. Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2021). Bringing political psychology into the study of populism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), https://doi.org/10. 1098/rstb.2020.0148
  24. Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228–1239.
  25. Stanley, B. (2017). Populism in Central and Eastern Europe. In March, L. (Eds.), Populism in the post-Soviet states. The Oxford handbook of populism, 214–231.
  26. Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A., & Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: Revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 420–439.
  27. Stewart, A. (1969). The social roots. In G. Ionescu & E. Gellner (Eds.), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics (pp. 180–196). Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  28. Stob, P. (2020). Intellectual populism: Democracy, inquiry, and the people. MSU Press.
  29. Stockemer, D. (2019). Conclusion. In D. Stockemer, (eds) Populism around the World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5_8
  30. Young, R. (2001). European Union democracy promotion policies: Ten years on. European Foreign Affairs Review, 6(3).