Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): People
Articles

The Relationship Between Reader and Writer in Contemporary Haiku Poems

Irina-Ana Drobot
University of Civil Engineering Bucharest
Bio

Published 2025-02-04

Keywords

  • reader response,
  • mindfulness,
  • present,
  • free associations,
  • dialogue

How to Cite

The Relationship Between Reader and Writer in Contemporary Haiku Poems. (2025). Papers in Arts and Humanities, 4(2), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.52885/bkvr1g61

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to look at the relationship of communication and readers’ participation in contemporary haiku poems. The poems selected for exemplification in this paper will be from Haiku Canada Members’ Anthology 2024. No Two Alike. The way in which readers work their way through meaning will be underlined, through free associations and use of universal symbols, and also based on common life experiences. A reader response approach will be adopted, since it has in view the way readers react to any text. Textual analysis will be combined with the readers’ emotional reactions and interpretations based on personal life experiences and cultural background. We can speak of communities of readers, in this case made up by the Western culture writers of an originally Japanese poem, the haiku. It is adapted and also compatible with other cultural mindsets. The way readers are engaged in the haiku poetry experience further leads to haiku being used in therapy, to encourage patients to express themselves, and become aware of their emotions, without thinking about the rules of this type of poem.

References

  1. Blasko, D. G., & Merski, D. W. (1998). Haiku poetry and metaphorical thought: An invitation to interdisciplinary study. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1101_5
  2. Ciubancan, M. (2015). Principles of communication in Japanese indirectness and hedging. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 10(4), 246–253.
  3. Gilli, F. (2001). The power of juxtaposition. New Zealand Poetry Society. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://thehaikufoundation.org/omeka/items/show/1062
  4. Hiraga, M. K. (1996). Vision as meaning: Visual iconicity of Basho’s haiku. In I. Rauch & G.F. Carr (Eds.) Semiotics around the World: Synthesis in Diversity, Semiotics around the World: Synthesis in Diversity: Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Berkeley 1994., Approaches to Semiotics, 126 (pp. 421–424). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820065
  5. Hiraga, M. K. (1999). “Blending” and an Interpretation of Haiku: A Cognitive Approach. Poetics Today, 20(3), 461–481.
  6. Hitsuwari, J., & Nomura, M. (2022). How individual states and traits predict aesthetic appreciation of haiku poetry. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237420986420
  7. Kals, E., & Müller, M. M. (2012). Emotions and environment. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 128–147). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0008
  8. Kern, A. L. (2021). The rise and fall and spring of haiku. In G.P. Leupp & D.-M. Tao (Eds.) The Tokugawa World (pp. 781–798). Routledge.
  9. Kimura, T. (2022). Haiku and Modernism in Japan. In T. Kiuchi & Y. Hakutani. (Eds.) Haiku, other arts, and literary disciplines (pp. 234–246). Lexington Books.
  10. kjmunro & St-Laurent, S. (Eds.). (2024). No Two Alike. 2024 Haiku Canada Members’ Anthology, Haiku Canada Publishing House.
  11. Lynch, T. (1989). An original relation to the universe: A study of North American Haiku. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://thehaikufoundation.org/omeka/files/original/15aa95407e7c820574b5a6d54ef2004b.pdf
  12. Mart, C. (2019). Reader-response theory and literature discussions: A Springboard for exploring literary texts. The New Educational Review, 56(2), 78–87. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/images/pliki/tner/201902/tner5606.pdf
  13. McCarty, S. (2008). Internationalizing the essence of haiku poetry. Taj Mahal Review 7, 61–65.
  14. Noma, H. (2009). How unique is Japanese culture? A critical review of the discourse in intercultural communication literature. Journal of International Education in Business, 2(2), 2–14.
  15. Ravaux, F. (1979). The return of the reader. The French Review, 52(5), 708–713.
  16. Rozhin, N. (2013). Exploring the Empty space. In The Asian Conference on Cultural Studies 5, The Asian Conference on Cultural Studies, Official Conference Proceedings. ACCS2013_0207 Retrieved October 31, 2024, from papers.iafor.org
  17. Schachter, J. (2018). Free association: From Freud to current use—the effects of training analysis on the use of free association. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 38(6), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2018.1480231
  18. Shklovsky, V. (1917). Art as technique. In J. Rivkin & M. Ryan (Eds.) Literary theory: An anthology, 3rd ed. (8–14), Wiley-Blackwell.
  19. Simpkins, C. A., & Simpkins, A. M. (2016). Simple Zen: A guide to living moment by moment. Tuttle Publishing.
  20. Ueda, M. (1963). Bashō and the Poetics of “Haiku.” Journal of aesthetics and art criticism 21(4), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/427098