Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Change
Articles

Digital Theseus: The Ship, the Self, and Cybernetic Transformations in Neuromancer

Decebal-Narcis Apostu
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iasi

Published 2025-09-11

Keywords

  • Posthumanism,
  • becoming,
  • identity,
  • Ship of Theseus,
  • cyberpunk

How to Cite

Digital Theseus: The Ship, the Self, and Cybernetic Transformations in Neuromancer. (2025). Papers in Arts and Humanities, 5(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.52885/mrxdcw47

Abstract

It is inconceivable to fantasize about a world where everything is stationary. This paper will utilize Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s concept of becoming as a foundational framework to analyze the themes of identity and transformation in William Gibson’s Neuromancer. The novel, written in 1984, explores the philosophical contradictions surrounding change and can be linked to the paradox of Theseus’ Ship. It explores how technological advancements challenge and redefine personal identity through specific examples such as cybernetic augmentation, mind uploading into the virtual, and body enhancements. These themes reflect Rosi Braidotti’s Posthumanist discourse and align with the perpetual change in human ontology. The novel highlights the disruptive forces that push the conventional borders between organic and artificial to their limits. Neuromancer interrogates the idea of continuous change in the context of technological enhancements. It replaces and redefines physical and cognitive capabilities by focusing on the fluidity and fragmentation of the self. Gibson challenges Cartesian dualism by portraying characters whose identities are merged with technology, thereby testing the capabilities of the human-machine individual. His work foreshadows contemporary debates on artificial intelligence and regulations governing body enhancement. Gibson extends the paradox of the Ship of Theseus beyond materiality, questioning identity as an ever-changing construct within the age of advanced cybernetics.

References

  1. Beaulieu, A. (2011). The status of animality in Deleuze’s thought. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 9(1/2), 69–88.
  2. Braidotti, R. (2018). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486
  3. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman Knowledge. Polity Press.
  4. Csicsery-Ronay Jr., I. (1992). Cyberpunk and neuromanticism. In L. McCaffery (Ed.), Storming the reality studio: A casebook of cyberpunk & postmodern science fiction (pp. 182–193). Duke University Press.
  5. Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (C. V. Boundas, Ed.). Athlone Press.
  6. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Athlone Press.
  7. Deleuze, G., & Negri, A. (2011, February 22). Control and becoming: A conversation between Toni Negri and Gilles Deleuze. The Funambulist. https://thefunambulist.net/editorials/philosophy-control-and-becoming-a-conversation-between-toni-negri-and-gilles-deleuze
  8. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
  9. Ferrando, F. (2020). Philosophical posthumanism (R. Braidotti, Ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
  10. Geretto, M. (2024). Humans, angels, and cyborgs aboard Theseus’ ship: Metaphysics, mythology, and mysticism in trans-posthumanist philosophies. Springer International Publishing.
  11. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. Ace Books.
  12. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Hollinger, V. (1990). Cybernetic deconstructions: Cyberpunk and postmodernism. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 23(2), 29–44.
  14. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press.
  15. Zourabichvili, F. (2012). Deleuze, a philosophy of the event: Together with the vocabulary of Deleuze (G. Lambert & D. W. Smith, Eds.; K. Aarons, Trans.). Edinburgh University Press.