Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Change
Articles

Fake News on Both Sides of the Border: Media Literacy Among Young Hungarians Living in the Partium Region (Romania) and Along the Hungarian Border

PDF
  • Attila Zoltán Kenyeres,
  • Judit T. Nagy
Attila Zoltán Kenyeres Eszterhazy Karoly Catholic University image/svg+xml
Judit T. Nagy Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary image/svg+xml

Bio

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • media literacy,
  • phishing,
  • Partium,
  • fake news,
  • students

Copyright (c) 2025 Attila Zoltán Kenyeres, Judit T. Nagy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Fake News on Both Sides of the Border: Media Literacy Among Young Hungarians Living in the Partium Region (Romania) and Along the Hungarian Border. (2025). Papers in Arts and Humanities, 5(2), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.52885/b2tsch62

Abstract

Digitalization and online social media platforms have radically transformed the flow of information. Anyone can disseminate almost any information on these platforms, including fake news and other fraudulent messages. The latter includes phishing scams and fake weepstakes. In this environment, media literacy is critical, as it enables individuals to critically evaluate media content from multiple perspectives and identify fraudulent content. Most research focusing on media literacy among young people has been based on selfreporting, examining a specific type of information, and only in the context of a single country. There is a lack of research exploring differences in media literacy among members of an ethnic group living in multiple countries. Our research simultaneously assesses, in practice, the ability to identify fake news, phishing scams, and fake sweepstakes among young Hungarians living in two neighboring countries on opposite sides of the Romanian–Hungarian border. The questionnaire consisted of 20 screenshots of real social media posts, emails, Messenger messages, and SMS messages. Each contained either verified false or real information, and participants had to decide the message’s authenticity based on clues in the screenshot. Based on the results, it can be said that young Hungarians in Partium scored significantly lower across all three deception categories than young Hungarians living across the border. This may be due to fundamental deficiencies in their media awareness, the different socio-cultural, infrastructural, and educational conditions in the two countries, and their status as an ethnic minority, but sampling and questionnaire bias may also play a role.

PDF

References

  1. Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023). Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: A review. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5
  2. Al-Zou’bi, R. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782
  3. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  4. Anandpara, V., Dingman, A., Jakobsson, M., Liu, D., & Roinestad, H. (2007). Phishing IQ tests measure fear, not ability. In D. Sven & D. Rachna (Eds.), Financial cryptography and data security (pp. 362–366). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77366-5_33
  5. Arin, K. P., Mazrekaj, D., & Thum, M. (2023). Ability of detecting and willingness to share fake news. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 34402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34402-6
  6. Ashley, S., Maksl, A., & Craft, S. (2013). Developing a news media literacy scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695812469802
  7. Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, C. M. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. The Aspen Institute Communications and Society. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365294.pdf
  8. Bajomi-Lázár, P., & Horváth, K. (2025). Two journalistic cultures in one country: The case of Hungary in the light of journalists’ discourses on fake news. Journalism Practice, 19(5), 1055–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2223173
  9. Bodaghi, A., Schmitt, K. A., Watine, P., & Fung, B. C. M. (2024). A literature review on detecting, verifying, and mitigating online misinformation. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11(4), 5119–5145. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3289031
  10. Butavicius, M., Taib, R., & Han, S. J. (2022). Why people keep falling for phishing scams: The effects of time pressure and deception cues on the detection of phishing emails. Computers & Security, 123, Article 102937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102937
  11. Çelik İ. T., Çerkez, Y., & İskifoğlu, G. (2022). Thinking culture and critical thinking dispositions of high school students in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1017747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017747
  12. Cerdà-Navarro, A., Abril-Hervás, D., Mut-Amengual, B., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2021). Fake or not fake, that is the question: Disinformation recognition among university students. Prisma Social, 34, 298–320. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4328
  13. Chávez-Fernández, J., Rodríguez-Barboza, R., López-Luján, S., & Flores, O. D. C. (2025). Critical reading as a tool for citizenship education: A review from the Peruvian context. Teoría Social y Pensamiento Crítico, 24, 146–155. https://zenodo.org/records/15384503
  14. Chen, S., Salleh, S. M., & Salleh, M. A. M. (2025). Media and information literacy among pre-service teachers: A systematic review of key trends and gaps (2013–2024). International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(2), Article 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100348
  15. Corbu, N., Bârgăoanu, A., Buturoiu, R., & Ștefăniță, O. (2020). Does fake news lead to more engaging effects on social media? Evidence from Romania. Communications, 45(1), 694–717. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0152
  16. Drotner, K., & Kobbernagel, Ch. (2014). Toppling hierarchies? Media and information literacies, ethnicity, and performative media practices. Learning, Media & Technology, 39(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.964255
  17. Faragó, L., Orosz, G., Paskuj, B., & Krekó, P. (2024). Analytic adolescents prevail over fake news — A large-scale preregistered study. Personality and Individual Differences, 229, Article 112747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112747
  18. Fastrez, P., Sutter Widmer, D., Bihl, J., Lacelle, N., & Gladu, E. (2022). Assessing media and information literacy: Teenagers’ practices and competence in information search and multimedia creation. In European conference on information literacy (pp. 477–489). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_40
  19. García-Ruiz, R., da Mota Matos, A. P., Arenas-Fernández, A., & Ugalde, C. (2020). Media literacy in primary education: International perspective of level of literacy competence. Pixel Bit Revista de Medios y Educacion, 58, 217–236. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.74535
  20. Gogus, A., Geçkin-Onat, S., & Yücel, S. (2024). General approaches of adults on new media literacy: A national survey study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9747–9767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12205-6
  21. Gupta, S., Sharma, D., & Thakur, R. A. (2023). Exploring factors affecting media information literacy: A mediation analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 43(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.43.02.18608
  22. Harrison, B., Svetieva, E., & Vishwanath, A. (2016). Individual processing of phishing emails. Online Information Review, 40(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0106
  23. Hobbs, R., & Frost, R. (2003). Measuring the acquisition of media‐literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 330–355. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.3.2
  24. Jackson, C., Simon, D. R., Tan, D. S., & Barth, A. (2007). An evaluation of extended validation and picture-in-picture phishing attacks. In D. Sven & D. Rachna (Eds.), International conference on financial cryptography and data security (pp. 281–293). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77366-5_27
  25. Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
  26. Jones, S.-L., & Procter, R. (2023). Young peoples’ perceptions of digital, media and information literacies across Europe: Gender differences, and the gaps between attitudes and abilities. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 32(4), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2210152
  27. Kenyeres, A. Z., & Szűts, Z. (2024). Az álhírek (fake news) definíciós kísérletei és nyelvi jelei [Fake news: Attempts to define it and its linguistic signs]. Magyar Nyelvőr, 148(2), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.38143/Nyr.2024.2.203
  28. Kenyeres, A. Z., & Szűts, Z. (2025). Az adathalászat (phishing) fogalmi definiálása és főbb nyelvi jelei [Phishing: Definitions and linguistic signs]. Magyar Nyelvőr, 149(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.38143/Nyr.2025.2.159
  29. Kenyeres, A. Z., & Weigand, L. (2023). From provoking emotions to fake images: The recurring signs of fake news and phishing scams spreading on social media in Hungary, Romania and Slovakia. In A. Andreatos & Ch. Douligeris (Eds.), European conference on cyber warfare and security (Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 726–732). https://doi.org/10.34190/eccws.22.1.1547
  30. Krekó, P. (2018). Tömegparanoia: Az összeesküvés-elméletek és álhírek szociálpszichológiája [Mass-paranoia: The social psychology of conspiracy theories and fake news]. Athenaeum Kiadó.
  31. Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., & Ikhlas, M. (2020). Do a science process skills affect on critical thinking in science? Differences in urban and rural. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 874–880. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20687
  32. Losano, M. G. (2025). The constitutional courts of Romania and Colombia on cyber interference and artificial intelligence. Diritto Pubblico Comparato Ed Europeo, 27(1), 117–138. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.17394/116459
  33. Mărcău, F. C., Peptan, C., Băleanu, V. D., Iana, S. A., & Gheorman, V. (2023). Analysis regarding the impact of ‘fake news’ on the quality of life of the population in a region affected by earthquake activity: The case of Romania–Northern Oltenia. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1244564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244564
  34. Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P., & Lavranos, C. (2020). A study of higher education students’ self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1413–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041
  35. Mazahir, I., & Yaseen, S. (2025). Media literacy in the age of misinformation: A mixed-methods analysis of adult media literacy across urban and rural areas of Pakistan. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 10(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2025.1.40
  36. Merga, M. K., & Mat Roni, S. (2025). “An uphill battle”: School library professionals fostering student reading engagement. English in Education, 59(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2025.2456718
  37. Michelot, F., Béland, S., & Poellhuber, B. (2022). A transnational comparative study of preservice teachers’ critical thinking skills and metaliteracy self-efficacy. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(5), 866–883. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-10-2021-0191
  38. Montiél Torres, M. F., Teruel Rodrígez, L., García-Faroldi, L., & Martín-Martín, F. M. (2025). Vulnerable groups and disinformation: An analysis of the Andalusian reality. Doxa Comunicación, 41, 369–393. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2902
  39. Mustață, M.-A., Răpan, I., Dumitrescu, L., Dobreva, H., Dimov, P., Lis, A., Révayová, E., Marineanu, V., Buluc, R., Olariu, C., Lucinescu, A., & Buță, C. (2023). Assessing the truthfulness of security and defence news in Central and Eastern Europe: The role of cognitive style and the promise of epistemic sophistication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(6), 1384–1396. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4130
  40. Orhan, A. (2023). Fake news detection on social media: The predictive role of university students’ critical thinking dispositions and new media literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00248-8
  41. Palau-Sampio, D., Carratalá, A., Tarullo, R., & Crisóstomo, P. (2022). Quality recognition as a prescriber against disinformation. Comunicar, 30(72), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-05
  42. Parsons, K., Butavicius, M., Pattinson, M., McCormac, A., Calic, D., & Jerram, C. (2016). Do users focus on the correct cues to differentiate between phishing and genuine emails? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04717
  43. Parsons, K., McCormac, A., Pattinson, M., Butavicius, M., & Jerram, C. (2013). Phishing for the truth: A scenario-based experiment of users’ behavioural response to emails. In L. J. Janczewski, H. B. Wolfe, & S. Shenoi (Eds.), Security and privacy protection in information processing systems (pp. 366–378). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39218-4_27
  44. Pérez-Escoda, A., Barrios-Rubio, A., Pedrero-Esteban, L. M., & Ávalos, C. (2024). Taking on social media as new gatekeepers among young people: A call upon digital literacy. Information, 15(4), Article 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040180
  45. Porshnev, A., & Miltsov, A. (2020). The effects of thinking styles and news domain on fake news recognition by social media users: Evidence from Russia. In International conference on human–computer interaction (pp. 305–320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_21
  46. Potter, W. J. (2010). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.521462
  47. Prakash, O. (2025). Is it time for India to set social media age limits for adolescents? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 67(2), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_1012_24
  48. Radu, B. V. (2023). A policy perspective on regulating disinformation in Romania during the Covid-19 pandemic. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(1), 108–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0005
  49. Rosu, M-M., Cosmoiu, A-M., Ianole-Calin, R., & Cornoiu, S. (2024). Stories worth sharing — Why do people spread news online? Online Information Review, 48(3), 581–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2022-0693
  50. Schulte-Cloos, J., & Anghel, V. (2024). Right-wing authoritarian attitudes, fast-paced decision-making, and the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. Political Communication, 41(4), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2291538
  51. Szabó, Gy. (2025, June 3). Eddig tűrt a Magyar Nemzeti Bank, megváltoztatják a banki utalások rendszerét a csalások miatt [The National Bank has put up with it until now, it will change the bank transfer system because of the scams]. Index. https://index.hu/gazdasag/2025/06/03/jegybank-mnb-felugyelet-csalassorozat-banki-utalas-kiberbunozes-varga-mihaly-bejelentes/
  52. Szebeni, Z., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Lönnqvist, J.-E., & Szabó, Zs. P. (2023). The price of (dis)trust — Profiling believers of (dis)information in the Hungarian context. Social Influence, 18(1), Article 2279662. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2023.2279662
  53. Tamam, B., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Suarsini, E. (2021). An investigation of rural–urban students’ critical thinking in biology across gender. Pedagogika, 142(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2021.142.11
  54. Teichmann, F., Boticiu, S. R., & Sergi, B. S. (2024). International management amid fake news and corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(6), 1674–1691. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2022-0110
  55. Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
  56. Turpo Gebera, O., Zea-Urviola, M., Huamaní-Portilla, F., & Girón-Pizarro, M. (2023). Media and information literacy in secondary students: Diagnosis and assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(2), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1746
  57. Uddin, B., Reza, N., Islam, M. S., Ahsan, H., & Amin, M. R. (2021). Fighting against fake news during pandemic era: Does providing related news help student internet users to detect COVID-19 misinformation? In Proceedings of the 13th ACM web science conference 2021 (pp. 178–186). https://doi.org/10.1145/3447535.3462508
  58. Veszelszki, Á. (2017). Az álhírek extra- és intralingvális jellemzői [Extralinguistic and intralinguistic characteristics of fake news]. Századvég, 84, 51–82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318990136
  59. Vintilă, M., Lăzărescu, G.-M., Kalaitzaki, A., Tudorel, O. I., & Goian, C. (2023). Fake news during the war in Ukraine: Coping strategies and fear of war in the general population of Romania and in aid workers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1151794. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1151794
  60. Vraga, E., Tully, M., Kotcher, J. E., Smithson, A. B., & Broeckelman-Post, M. (2015). A multi-dimensional approach to measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 7(3), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-7-3-4
  61. Walters, R. M. (2018). How to tell a fake: Fighting back against fake news on the front lines of social media. Texas Review of Law & Politics, 23(1), 111–179. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/trlp23&div=6&id=&page=
  62. Wong, K. L. L., Chiu, M. M., Chan, K., Chong, K. M. E., Bhomwik, M., & Kryzwosz-Rynkiewicz, B. (2025). Media and information literacy’s antecedents and consequences: A survey of Hong Kong University students. Information Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251359962
  63. Yang, R., Zheng, K., Wu, B., Li, D., Wang, Z., & Wang, X. (2022). Predicting user susceptibility to phishing based on multidimensional features. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 7058972. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7058972
  64. Yesmin, S. (2024). Misinformation, disinformation and malinformation and related issues: Experimental evidence of LIS students’ recognition and capacity of dealing. Science and Technology Libraries, 43(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2023.2238005
  65. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6f